Testing and certification
XenServer uses a modified Linux kernel that is similar but not identical to the kernel distributed by a popular Linux distribution. In contrast, the XenServer control domain is currently based on a different distribution. In addition, the 32 bit XenServer control domain kernel is running above the 80K lines of code that are the 64 bit Xen hypervisor itself. While Citrix is very confident in the stability of the hypervisor, its presence represents a different software installation than exists with the stock vendor kernel installed on bare hardware.
In particular, there are issues that may be taken for granted on an x86 processor, such as the difference between physical and device bus memory addresses (for example virt_to_phys() as opposed to virt_to_bus()), timing, and interrupt delivery which may have subtle differences in a hypervisor environment.
For these reasons, expose hardware drivers to a set of testing on the XenServer control domain kernel to ensure the same level of confidence that exists for drivers in enterprise distribution releases. Similarly, userspace software that is included in supplemental packs must be tested comprehensively, to ensure that the assumptions it makes about the environment in which it runs (for example, concerning the presence of certain executables) are not invalidated.
The remainder of this section considers driver testing. If you want to release supplemental packs that do not only contain drivers, contact Citrix for advice. As a minimum, such pack authors must comprehensively test the functionality of the software being included in the pack, as well as perform stress testing of the XenServer major features, to ensure that none are impacted by the software in the pack.
Assuming the driver in question has already undergone verification testing on a Linux distribution very similar to the one used in the XenServer control domain, a subset of the verification test suite with a focus on representative tests is typically sufficient.
Some common areas of focus are:
Installation verification. Installation is now performed using an RPM, which may be different from how the driver is typically installed.
CLI operation. If a CLI is included, its operation is a key scenario and typically provides a good end-to-end exercising of all related code.
Adapter configuration, non-volatile/flash RAM, or BIOS upgrades. Any functions that access the physical hardware must be verified due to the presence of the Xen hypervisor and its role in coordination of hardware resources amongst virtual machines.
Data integrity and fault injection. Long-haul and/or stress-based data integrity verification tests to verify no data corruption issues exist. Basic fault injection tests such as cable un-plug/re-plug and timeout handling for verification of common error conditions.
Coverage of a representative set of device models. For example, if a Fibre Channel HBA driver supports a set of models that operate at either 2 Gb/s or 4 Gb/s, include one model each from the 2 Gb/s and 4 Gb/s families for testing.
Key hardware configuration variations. Run any hardware configurations that exercise the driver or related code in significantly different ways, such as locally versus remotely attached storage.
Since the physical device drivers run in the XenServer control domain, the majority of tests will also be run in the control domain. This allows simple re-use of existing Linux-based tests.
To provide high-performance device I/O to guest domains, XenServer includes synthetic device drivers for storage and networking that run in a guest and communicate their I/O requests with corresponding back-end drivers running in the control domain. The back-end drivers then issue the I/O requests to the physical drivers and devices and manage transmitting results and completion notifications to the synthetic drivers. This approach provides near bare-metal performance.
As a result, tests that require direct access to the device will fail when run within a guest domain. However, running load-generation and other tests that do not require direct access to the device and/or driver within Linux and Windows guest domains is very valuable as such tests represent how the majority of load will be processed in actual XenServer installations.
When running tests in guest domains, ensure that you do so with the XenServer synthetic drivers installed in the guest domain. Installation of the synthetic drivers is a manual process for some guests. See XenServer Help for more details.
Tests that require an integrated build
One of the primary goals of the DDK is to allow partners to create, compile, and test their drivers with XenServer without requiring a “back-and-forth” of components with the XenServer engineering team.
However, some tests will only be possible after the driver RPMs and any accompanying binary RPMs have been supplied to Citrix and integrated into the XenServer product. Two examples are installing to, and booting from, Fibre Channel and iSCSI LUNs.
In these cases additional coordination is required after the components have been provided to Citrix to provide a pre-release XenServer build with the integrated components for testing.
Certification and support
Citrix maintains a XenServer Hardware Compatibility List (HCL), found at https://hcl.xenserver.com. This lists all devices that have been tested and confirmed to function correctly with the XenServer product.
In order to be listed on the XenServer HCL, hardware vendors must utilize the appropriate certification kit, obtainable from http://www.citrix.com/ready/hcl. The test kits contain a mix of manual and automated tests that are run on a host that contains the hardware to be certified. In general, two such hosts are required to perform the tests. Test results are submitted to Citrix for validation, and if they are approved, the device is listed on the HCL within a small number of working days, along with a link to the supplemental pack that contains any necessary driver, if this has not yet been incorporated into the XenServer product. In general, such supplemental packs will be hosted on partner web sites, though Citrix may additionally opt to link to (or host) the pack on its own Knowledge Base site.
For certification of converged or hybrid devices, such as CNAs, each function of the device must be separately certified. This implies that for a device with both networking and storage (HBA) functionality, both the networking certification tests and the storage certification tests must be carried out.
There is no restriction on who is permitted to submit certifications to the XenServer HCL, for example, it is not the case that only the hardware vendor can submit certifications for their products. Having said this, Citrix strongly prefers hardware vendors to perform certification testing, as they are best placed to test all of their products’ features.
Once a device is listed on the HCL, Citrix will take support calls from customers who are using that device with XenServer. It is expected that partners who submit devices for inclusion in the HCL will collaborate with Citrix to provide a fix for any issue that is later found with XenServer which is caused by said device.
At present, supplemental packs that contain userspace software to be installed into dom0 may only be issued by partners who have agreements in place with Citrix where the partner provides level 1 and level 2 support to their customers.
The reason for this is because Citrix will not necessarily have had the opportunity to test a supplemental pack of a partner, and hence must rely on partner testing of the pack as installed on XenServer. Therefore, only partners who perform testing that has been agreed as sufficient by Citrix can ship supplemental packs. If a customer installs a pack that is not from an approved partner, their configuration will be deemed unsupported by Citrix: any issues found will need to be reproduced on a standard installation of XenServer, without the pack installed, if support is to be given.
Partners who want to produce supplemental packs that contain more than solely drivers must discuss this with their Citrix relationship manager as early as possible, in order to discuss what software is appropriate for inclusion, and what testing must be performed.